Skip to main content

Posts

Finally started seeing some movement in Google after months of basically nothing

I’ve been working on a relatively new website, and honestly, SEO has probably been the most confusing part of the whole thing. I was writing content, fixing pages, changing titles and descriptions, and doing all the usual things people recommend. But for a while, it felt like I was doing all of that for absolutely nothing. Google had indexed some of my pages, but they were barely getting impressions, never mind clicks. I knew backlinks were probably part of the problem because my website basically had none. The annoying thing is that everyone tells you to “build quality backlinks,” but nobody really explains how a small website is supposed to do that without already having an audience or spending half the day sending emails that nobody answers. I tried some manual outreach, but it was painfully slow. Most people didn’t reply, and some wanted more money for one link than I was comfortable spending. Maybe outreach works well once you know exactly what you’re doing, but as a beginner, ...
Recent posts

What A Claude Watermark Can & Can’t Tell You About Authorship via @sejournal, @MattGSouthern

Anthropic plans to watermark Claude text. This article explains what a watermark can confirm and why not finding one doesn't mean the text isn't AI-generated. The post What A Claude Watermark Can & Can’t Tell You About Authorship appeared first on Search Engine Journal . from Search Engine Journal https://ift.tt/47W1y8p

Are SEOs actually paying $300+ a month for AI visibility tracking?

I've been doing more AEO work recently and testing various platforms for tracking brand visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI results etc. One thing I can't quite get my head around is the pricing. Once you start tracking a decent number of prompts, competitors and AI engines, some of these tools get expensive very quickly. And ultimately I'm mainly trying to answer: Does the brand appear? Which competitors appear instead? Which prompts are we weak for? What sources are the AI engines citing? Which URLs/domains keep getting referenced? Is visibility improving after we make changes? What did each AI engine actually say? I wanted this data for my own AEO work without worrying about prompt allowances, so we ended up putting together Llumo using a combination of open-source technology and functionality we're building ourselves. We've taken a BYOK approach. The platform itself is free. You add your own API keys and pay the underlying pro...

Decent traffic on Google vs no traffic on Bing

I started doing SEO for a website on both the platforms. While Google picked up in the first week itself, Bing has been weird with a few spikes with a couple of impressions on certain days and no traffic on most of the days. What can I do to get some traffic from Bing? submitted by /u/Affectionate-Tea3834 [link] [comments] from The SEO Authority https://ift.tt/bI6plS8

The GEO Trust Gap: SEOs Want The Data, But Not The Platforms Selling It via @sejournal, @DuaneForrester

Practitioners value AI visibility data highly and won't fund the platforms selling it. New survey data on what's actually blocking the category. The post The GEO Trust Gap: SEOs Want The Data, But Not The Platforms Selling It appeared first on Search Engine Journal . from Search Engine Journal https://ift.tt/oSOgpq7