Skip to main content

Posts

Are SEOs actually paying $300+ a month for AI visibility tracking?

I've been doing more AEO work recently and testing various platforms for tracking brand visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI results etc. One thing I can't quite get my head around is the pricing. Once you start tracking a decent number of prompts, competitors and AI engines, some of these tools get expensive very quickly. And ultimately I'm mainly trying to answer: Does the brand appear? Which competitors appear instead? Which prompts are we weak for? What sources are the AI engines citing? Which URLs/domains keep getting referenced? Is visibility improving after we make changes? What did each AI engine actually say? I wanted this data for my own AEO work without worrying about prompt allowances, so we ended up putting together Llumo using a combination of open-source technology and functionality we're building ourselves. We've taken a BYOK approach. The platform itself is free. You add your own API keys and pay the underlying pro...
Recent posts

Decent traffic on Google vs no traffic on Bing

I started doing SEO for a website on both the platforms. While Google picked up in the first week itself, Bing has been weird with a few spikes with a couple of impressions on certain days and no traffic on most of the days. What can I do to get some traffic from Bing? submitted by /u/Affectionate-Tea3834 [link] [comments] from The SEO Authority https://ift.tt/bI6plS8

The GEO Trust Gap: SEOs Want The Data, But Not The Platforms Selling It via @sejournal, @DuaneForrester

Practitioners value AI visibility data highly and won't fund the platforms selling it. New survey data on what's actually blocking the category. The post The GEO Trust Gap: SEOs Want The Data, But Not The Platforms Selling It appeared first on Search Engine Journal . from Search Engine Journal https://ift.tt/oSOgpq7