Skip to main content

Is irrelevant organic traffic good or bad for SEO?

Dear SEO community,

I am stumped with a situation that I have encountered with an outside SEO consultant.

I've recently hired outside help to assist me with SEO. The website is an e-commerce store for home appliances. In their report, they gave me, among other things, the recommendations for how to set up my filters for the search engine on my site.

The filters have parameters that are irrelevant for the products that I sell online. When I asked them why I would need to have such filters on my website, they claimed that these filters were based on their traffic research (for my competitors), and that any kind of traffic is good (as long as it is free, i.e. not PPC). Their logic being that this way, even if I attract a visitor to my website who is not able to find the information and product that he is looking for, I have at least some sort of probability of converting him into a customer. I claimed that such a traffic/audience would spend little time on my website and my bounce rates would be high, which would then go on to negatively affect my SEO.

I am far from being an expert in SEO, so I have no idea which way to go at this spot. Any kind of elaboration/advice would be greatly appreciated.

submitted by /u/fcmeder
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3djHX3q

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...