Skip to main content

Does a link from a sponsored article have any SEO value?

I am considering paying for a sponsored post that would appear on nowtoronto dot com in their brand voice section. For example go to nowtoronto dot com, scroll to the bottom where it says "brand voices" then click on one of those articles for example "Coors Seltzer launches the easiest and most refreshing ‘volunteer’ program in time for April 22". on the following article page there are links they are do follow links. Do these links have any value? or does google "know" that this is a paid post and just ignore the link value / not pass any juice?

OK i just noticed that some of the sponsored articles on this website are actually listed as "nofollow sponsored" where as other sponsored articles don't have this on the links. For example look at the article titled: "Sell your house, support the food bank?" (you might have to search this in google to find it, it's not recent).

So my updated question is, if the article has links and they are not explicitly "nofollow" but the article lives in this same section as the rest of the sponsored content. does it pass link juice?

submitted by /u/CaribouFondue
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3vnpOcA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...