Skip to main content

Upskilling great writers to also be great at SEO - better approach?

Over the past few years, I've worked closely with content teams where the typical scenario was me helping upskill the teams of writers and subject matter experts to better optimize their content for SEO. Generally, the advice I gave was to know "best practices" for topics, keywords, layout, titling, etc., WITHOUT sacrificing the value or impact of their writing. A blog no one wants to read will fail even if it's perfectly optimized for search.

The concept of this sounds great, but practically it's far from perfect as a good number of people get overwhelmed and struggle to grasp the concepts or reject the creative interference. On the other side, others go too far and lose their creative edge and look to SEMRush, Mangools, etc. to steer their direction instead of informing and help guide. I've even seen a team where the copyeditor was also well versed in SEO skills and would optimize the copy before publishing without writer input.

In understanding that from pitching to publishing that having some foresight for search can help illuminate massive opportunities, is my experience par for the course, or are there better approaches to help teams up their SEO game?

submitted by /u/Pure_Entrepreneur_22
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3gCUUsx

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...