Skip to main content

Split dictionary entries into separate pages or one master page?

Hi reddit!

I'm building a small dictionary for my site that'll contain explanations on some of the most common expressions and concepts related to the industry in question. The explanations are fairly short, each term is explained with approx. 100 words. My original idea was an accordion-style layout, where each dictionary term could be clicked, and a box would reveal the explanation of the term, so the user would be on the dictionary page the entire time.

But I'm wondering if it's better practice SEO-wise to split it up into separate pages, e.g. you click on a term, and it leads you to a specific page like /dictionary/term and then that individual page has meta keywords, meta title etc. From a usability standpoint, considering the entries are so short, it could be frustrating to be led to an entirely new page for every term you want to read up on.

What's best practice?

Thanks in advance!

submitted by /u/cunta
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3j7Q5XS

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...