Skip to main content

Nofollow reciprocal links to avoid penalties?

I've recently learned that Redfin.com (a very large real estate site) is using the following method to build links to new blog posts.

  1. Email relevant websites asking them to provide a quote for a new post they are writing.
  2. In the email, they state that they will link to your site and include the quote in the post free of charge, as long as you link back to the blog post once it's up.
  3. Once posted, they nofollow the links from the quoted websites, seemingly to avoid penalties by Google for reciprocal links with these new posts.

For an example, Google "7 Affordable Ways to Make Your Kitchen Look More Expensive redfin". (I'd include the link but my post keeps getting taken down)

Any idea on if adding the nofollow to these outgoing links is enough to avoid any red flags from Google? Or does this very large and successful site just have it wrong?

Thanks!

submitted by /u/KevinBR3
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/2YaZ0RQ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...