Skip to main content

Will linking an image to it's image file cause Google to send traffic to the image file instead of the page itself?

Hey all!

I've got some images on a page and I want them to show up in Google image search, and I also want the users to be able to click each image if they want to, and go directly to the image file to get a bigger image. (if that makes sense. Basically, it's the setting in Wordpress where you can link your image to the image file, so the user can click it and go to a page of just the image).

The thing is, I don't want Google to send traffic to the image files (rather than the actual page). I would rather it send the traffic to the page with all the images. I know it will do this if I don't create any links to the image files, but if I do create links to the images, will Google still send the traffic to the page (and not just directly to the image)?

Hope that makes sense! Thanks!

submitted by /u/vegan-dad
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3u2LzAY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...