Skip to main content

Warby Parker dodges 1-800 Contacts lawsuit over search results, website

A lawsuit filed by 1-800 Contacts against online retailer Warby Parker has been dismissed by a federal judge.

At issue was Warby Parker’s use of 1-800 Contacts’ branded keywords to redirect searchers to the Warby Parker online store, thereby “confusing” potential customers.

The decision. Kevin Castel, senior judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, ruled against 1-800 Contacts, saying that customers are unlikely to think that they’re buying from 1-800 Contacts when they click on a Warby Parker ad.

Castel also said the companies’ trademarks were too dissimilar to confuse contact-lens buyers, who are likely to pay close attention to what they are purchasing and noted that Warby Parker’s name is clearly displayed in the search results and on its website.

Castel added that prospective customers will take the time to figure out that the search results link to Warby Parker’s website, and will therefore discern that they are buying from contacts from Warby Parker’s website. 

In my own Google search, I was unable to mimic the results that this suit was based on and didn’t find any Warby Parker ads initially.

1-800 Contacts response. A spokesperson for 1-800 Contacts said after the ruling that the decision by the judge was “inconsistent with several well-established legal principles,” and that the company is “evaluating appropriate next steps, including whether to appeal.”

You can read the article and ruling from Reuters here.

Sounds familiar. Competitive keyword advertising lawsuits rarely turn out well for the trademark owners in court. Earlier this year we reported on an attempt by Edible Arrangements to sue Google over theft, conversion and racketeering. Edible Arrangements lost that lawsuit.  

Why we care. The dismissal of this case against Warby Parker should concern advertisers who are competing for branded keywords. If you’re facing a similar issue, you can visit the Google trademark help document, but it can be a painstakingly long, and temporary band-aid for a much bigger issue. On the contrary, if you’re using another brand’s keywords in your ad strategy, be careful, as you could see yourself in hot water. 

The post Warby Parker dodges 1-800 Contacts lawsuit over search results, website appeared first on Search Engine Land.



from Search Engine Land https://ift.tt/G6J0shT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wordpress Tag Div Composer

Can somebody help me with scroll to class ( call to action ) button for long article, I wanna drive readers to specific place on the page… I keep adding the name and save then click on it but it’s not working? I cleared cache and still not working… Help please! submitted by /u/NadaGamalEldean [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3Bi5uf2

HTTP-HTTPS redirects: domain level or each URL?

Googling for answers seems to give conflicting answers here. We have a domain that has been HTTP but some individual URLs have been HTTPS (like form pages). We are about to deploy HTTPS redirect on the server to get everything going to https://www.domain.com . Do we have to go to the effort of a big 301 redirect list of all page-level URLs without Google dropping our earned page rank? Thanks all! submitted by /u/runtmc2 [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/31dJ82b

One website, two properties (domains)

I wasn't sure how to frame that title so let me explain; Due to error on my part, I have ended up with, a www.xyz.com , version of my website, and one that's just xyz.com. Now I'm tracking my traffic differently on GSC and GA. I'm not sure how to feel about this. Is there anyone with a similar situation? Should I just go on like usual or are there things I need to start doing differently? Kindly advise. submitted by /u/Blessed_Dude_101010 [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/87Z2MRA