Skip to main content

Dumb Question: Can someone get dinged by Google for backlinks from a site that no longer exists?

Without getting to technical, my company hosts websites for clients using a SaaS product. A particular client left our business and transitioned to a new brand, and is now claiming the website she had with us is causing their new site trouble with toxic backlinks.

But the site she had with us, and all DNS, domain, SSL, and all other aspects of their site with us was deleted when they left our company.

Does this sound possible? I am not typically involved with SEO but have been asked to look into this issue.

submitted by /u/-Rivendare
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/yUSYbwl

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...