Skip to main content

Local Seo Serp View

May need some local seo experts for this one..

I have a clients and I’m doing the most of pages I’ve ever done for them so I’m trying to be careful of canonisation.

I’m trying to keep a difference between her location page and services pages.

I have her main location pages url set as example/cleaners- (Nottingham)

Then The other pages are are places signing that city such as cleaners-bullwell, cleaners-Ashley etc (help with relevance/prominity)

I want tot keep any location keywords away from the service side of her site but still want to make them relevant to where her business is.

So, would it better to have the title tag and Page title of her services the county/state she’s in or can I still add her city.

What I thing is better :

Title tag : commercial cleaning services| Business name | East midland

Page tile : Commercial cleaning services

What I currently but I thing will cannobilize the location pages:

Commercial cleaning services | business name | Nottingham

Don’t know if I’m overthinking it but I like to be precise so how do you guys approach it?

And what’s the best way to avoid canonicalising/ cannibalising between pages on a local site

Thanks!!

submitted by /u/Pattzfr5
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/i34AM7k

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...