Skip to main content

Should I post more THIN Content, or less FAT Content?

Hi guys, I am hoping someone with experience could give me a little SEO advice?

(I mainly create web design tutorials for reference).

Basically, I find myself spending way too long “perfecting” my posts, before I publish them.

To the point where I have only been publishing around 1 post per fortnight (sometimes, less).

My question is, am I better of publishing say, 2x “thinner” posts a week and “fattening” them up later when I'm in the mood?

Or, is it better to create 1x post a fortnight, but making sure they’re 100% finished?

And just to clarify, by thin content, I really don’t mean crap, just like 70/80% of what it could be.

Any advice on this would be awesome and greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
ElectricRains.

P.S.

I know the whole quality over content argument, and definitely agree that quality is better.

But, if the posts aren't crap, just not 100%, am I better off posting them sooner, so they get indexed, then make them better over time.

submitted by /u/ElectricRains
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/SsebhuE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...