Skip to main content

Should I post more THIN Content, or less FAT Content?

Hi guys, I am hoping someone with experience could give me a little SEO advice?

(I mainly create web design tutorials for reference).

​

Basically, I find myself spending way too long “perfecting” my posts, before I publish them.

To the point where I have only been publishing around 1 post per fortnight (sometimes, less).

My question is, am I better of publishing say, 2x “thinner” posts a week and “fattening” them up later when I'm in the mood?

Or, is it better to create 1x post a fortnight, but making sure they’re 100% finished?

​

And just to clarify, by thin content, I really don’t mean crap, just like 70/80% of what it could be.

​

Any advice on this would be awesome and greatly appreciated!

Thanks,
ElectricRains.

​

P.S.

I know the whole quality over content argument, and definitely agree that quality is better.

But, if the posts aren't crap, just not 100%, am I better off posting them sooner, so they get indexed, then make them better over time.

submitted by /u/ElectricRains
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/SsebhuE
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Google vs. ChatGPT: Hidden Cost of AI on the Environment and Society

Today, I read the Economic Survey of 2025 (released on 31 JAN 2025), which raises serious concerns about global warming and environmental sustainability. With the rapid advancement of AI, businesses are increasing profits by reducing their dependence on human employees. However, this is not only a threat to community well-being but also poses grave risks to our climate. ChatGPT consumes 10 times more power than Google Search for processing a single query. There was a time when Google contributed more to a healthier environment, but with the integration of AI into its search engine, the power consumption has surged beyond that of ChatGPT. The primary energy source for these operations is, of course, electricity. Let’s understand the implications. AI-powered systems require immense computational power to process and deliver results. Google claims to be reducing its carbon footprint, but the reality is that AI-driven searches demand far more power than traditional ranking-based search ...
Post a Comment
Read more