Skip to main content

Using keywords effectively

Bit out of my comfort zone in this sub, but here goes…I’m a career marketer recently fallen into copywriting, and I have what is possibly a very dumb question. I’ve not had much exposure to digital so please forgive, but I think I get the basics.

Sometimes I get briefs with a few keywords/phrases that are maybe 3 or 4 words long but you need to add words between them like in, the, that, etc. to make them fit nicely into well-written copy. So that’s what I’ve been doing.

My question is this: it’s cool to do that, yeah? It doesn’t mess with SEO because Google knows what’s what? And clients know this when they give you these focus keywords? I don’t want to seem dumb to my clients by asking them to confirm but I also don’t want to submit copy that’s not on brief. Am I being stupid and doubting myself for no reason? Can anyone help an aging millennial out?

submitted by /u/LloydRainy
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/UTgG4kO

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...