Skip to main content

Is Search Console hiding clicks on queries with senstive information?

Google Search Console broadly says this:

  • To protect user privacy, the Performance report doesn't show all data. For example, we might not track some queries that are made a very small number of times or those that contain personal or sensitive information. Due to internal limitations, Search Console stores top data rows and not all data rows. As a result, not all queries beyond anonymized queries will be shown. Instead, the focus is on showing you the most important ones for your entire property.

I'm seeing queries that include abortion in them. Queries where we are somehow getting 3-10x the impressions than the rest even when we show up as the 90th result. But 0 clicks for all (but one, that had a single click) queries that include the term abortion.

I've even searched the most popular query that includes "abortion" and clicked through, and Search Console isn't showing it after updating the results.

Is this a tracking issue with Search Console? Is it intended to protect sensitive/personal information? I haven't been able to confirm either. But I need to as these are the vast majority of our website impressions.

Thank you in advance for any help.

submitted by /u/Millerturq
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/8zmxEOW

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...