Skip to main content

SEO giveth, and SEO taketh away.

Last year, we had a weird case—a complete first for me. A lady from this group (yes, you) made me jump through hoops: audits, reports, signed contracts, NDAs, and whatnot. At some point, I noticed things were getting muddy, so I passed it to our CEO, who has more experience closing this type of deal. The only thing remaining was to send the downpayment. Then, the CEO of their company told ours that he would

"NEVER pay that kind of money to someone outside the US"

and that he’d only pay a maximum of 1/4th because we were "inferior" (sic). Please note the amount was arranged by both parts and was in the contracts.

In an attempt to save the project, our CEO contacted the lady, and she outright lied to his face, claiming they’d found someone better. She wasn’t aware of the earlier conversation, and all contracts had already been signed, leaving us with two options: she’s either a pathological liar or an unethical person.

Here’s the kicker: they were so ignorant they left access to their stats even though we told them to block it and wished them luck (we wouldn’t stoop to their level). Last week, I received the monthly recap from GSC, showing they’ve lost 59% on top of the 70% they’d already lost when they contacted us. Out of curiosity, I checked GA4, and they still haven’t revoked access. They’re basically surviving on PPC—organic traffic is at an all-time low.

It may sound petty, but this was a brutal example of “you got what you deserved” or simply “I told you so.”

Now, on a brighter note: around the same time, someone about to close their business reached out for help as a last resort, with a very small budget. It sounded like a good opportunity to help someone who truly deserved it (we know the owner, and he’s a genuinely good person). The problems were clear to us—mostly technical issues, some weak content, and a lack of backlinks.

We worked on that, and now this is what heaven looks like: Google sending anomaly alerts every 4-5 days because they’re detecting far more traffic than expected (see the capture in the comments).

Here’s the contrast: the first business had (and still has) the budget and resources. The second was on the brink of bankruptcy but paid us what we asked without hesitation.

Karma is a bitch, I guess.

P.S. I won’t post captures of the unethical crooks, just the good ones.

submitted by /u/AbleInvestment2866
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/Aj4wmk9

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...