Skip to main content

Did I shoot myself in the foot?

I’m an elopement photographer in the Pacific Northwest.

When I first started out, I created a ton of “how to elope” guides on random places like Italy, Bali, Norway, etc. However, I have absolutely no desire or plan to photograph elopements outside of the Pacific Northwest.

These guides brought in some traffic to my site, with some of them even ranking on page 1.

I was told to delete this content in order for Google to see me more as an authority in the Pacific Northwest.

I only had 1 blog post that had a backlink so I redirected it. Otherwise, I deleted the guides with a 410.

It’s been a few days and now my rankings have plummeted. Part of me wants to stick it out, as I think in the long run it may help Google see me as more of an authority and rank my PNW posts better. Part of me wants to reinstate these guides. Did I shoot myself in the foot by doing this?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

submitted by /u/briannaparksphoto
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/CQyktJW

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...