Skip to main content

Hot Take: You shouldn't add EEAT to make EEAT in your content

There's been plenty of fun and informative debates about EEAT on here, other subs, X and LinkedIn. And even at the Google Search Team level

And I wanted to hone in to what I think is the worst part of EEAT - not just the people parroting LLMS with "EEAT signals" or "EEAT algorithms" - esp in AI Slop GEO content - is that EEAT is inferred, it already exists.

We need to stop writing every document with claims of expertise and experience - why even make people think?

Expertise and Experience is subjective to every person - who has enough of either depends on a huge scale - especially if you are an expert.

I see people giving terrible SEO advice - like XML sitemaps will make your crawled, not indexed content get indexed (not it frigging won't) - and then people are like "Well I have 8 years SEO experience" - clearly its pretty narrow.

Mentioning EEAT actually isn't natural

Stop being overly Literal

Injecting actual claims of experience is seriously off putting. And no, Google doesnt "detect" it and people might actually start to wonder if they're following the wrong person.

I dont start citing how many websites I've worked on when I do podcasts or write blog posts or how many decades SEO experience I have, because I 'm not impressed by anyone else who does either.

People with less years experience can have more expertise

There are SEO experts with 3 years experience who know more than people working on one site for 18 years.....

submitted by /u/WebLinkr
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/BH63Plp

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...