Skip to main content

Are long-term contracts actually increasing our churn rates?

I’ve been running a boutique agency for about 4 years now. Since day one, my standard operating procedure has been the industry classic: minimal 6-12 month retainers. My logic was always "SEO takes time, I need to protect my resources".

But lately, I’m noticing a brutal trend. Clients sign the 12-month contract, they get "bored" or anxious around month 9, and the second the contract expires, they bolt. It feels like the contract creates a countdown clock to churn rather than a partnership.

I’ve been doing some competitive analysis on other UK agencies to see how they handle this friction. I noticed shops like Doublespark and a few others are pushing heavily on a "no contract / cancel anytime" model.

As an agency owner, this gives me anxiety. How do you justify front-loading the heavy technical audit work in Month 1 if the client can just walk away in Month 2? You’d be operating at a loss.

But on the flip side, does the "fear of losing the client next month" actually keep the agency sharper?

Have you experimented with dropping the 12-month lock-in? Did your LTV (Lifetime Value) actually go up because clients felt less "trapped," or did it just turn your agency into a revolving door?

I’m seriously considering A/B testing this with new leads, but I’m terrified of messing up my cash flow.

submitted by /u/badenbagel
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/hwId6b2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...