Skip to main content

Is it a good idea to separate pages for photography genres?

I hope this is OK to ask here.

I'm going to assume it would be more beneficial, but I want to ask before I do the extra work on my website..

I do maternity, newborn and family photography. They're kind of related, but at the same time could be separate entities.

On my home page I have the H1 set with "maternity and newborn." Right now I'm ranking 45-50 for that, but my site is just now 6 months old. I'm thinking I should target the genres separately and each have their own kind of "info" page instead of one whole info page talking about them all.

I live in a large metropolitan, but in a suburb so I have my city, the bigger city, and the state to use(since it's common for the state to be used here) on top of each genre to consider. I'm more concerned with just maternity and newborn though.

I'm trying to maximize each potential keyword spreading them out amongst H1 tags(on separate pages). I know only one H1 tag per page.

Is this overkill or just best to stick with targeting those keywords where I already have them(home, about, galleries, etc) and focus more on blogs?

Do the keywords also get enough targeting through other tags(h2, h3 ,p) to where I don't need to do the extra deconstruct and reconstruct of my site?

submitted by /u/quixoticnymph
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3dSCJNZ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...