Skip to main content

Help me make sense of this. AI cannibalization and content stealing, again?

If you're not familiar with my situation, know that I have a website, well, actually two, neither properly present in the Google SERP due to the latest updates, but my content is still used quite a bit in the Gemini AI it seems, especially the content from my YouTube videos that cover the same topics as the websites.

I recently published a review of the Xiaomi BE7000 which included some tests that no one conducted and then I waited until Gemini found it.

And I think it did, but I don't understand what exactly is that I am seeing:

"

Here's a look at a review of the Xiaomi BE7000 that dives into latency results:

  • TopView ai offers a review with speed tests, latency performance, and software analysis [Review of Xiaomi BE7000 WiFi 7 Router]. In their testing, the BE7000 showed impressive latency, with results staying below 50 milliseconds for 95% of the time during multi-client scenarios. There were some fluctuations, though, with Wi-Fi 5 clients experiencing higher latency compared to Wi-Fi 6 and 6E devices.

Overall, the review highlights the BE7000's strong performance for latency, making it a good choice for users who prioritize responsiveness in their network. You can find other reviews by searching the web for "Xiaomi BE7000 WiFi 7 Router Review".

"

So, another AI did latency tests on the router and Gemini apparently found a review that it can't add the link to (wanna bet that it's mine?). The problem is that like I said, no one else tested this router for its latency performance, except for me.

submitted by /u/Mark_Benson
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/hwkl8MV
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0
Post a Comment
Read more

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...
Post a Comment
Read more