Skip to main content

Location Based Service Pages For Remote Therapy Company

Hey everyone, new to SEO and got my first client a remote therapy company.

They want me to work on SEO for them and I thought I might try and focus on their niche plus local service pages based on UK cities because the competition isn't super strong.

I understand there's a risk of google flagging content as being duplicate if the pages are too similar so obviously want to avoid that.

I'm basically still an idiot at this so would really appreciate some veteran advice.

Please could you roast my stupid SEO padawan plan:

Separate pages vs one dynamic template

Do you create a fully distinct page for each city, or use URL parameters and swap in the city name dynamically?

How much unique copy is enough?

If I’m swapping “Bristol” for “Liverpool” in headings and a few paragraphs but most of the core content (therapy overview, session format, testimonials) stays the same, will Google see these as duplicates?

Roughly how many words or sections should be bespoke per city to avoid cannibalisation?

Any tips on ideal page length, structuring headings, or schema for “areaServed” would be hugely appreciated. Thanks in advance!

submitted by /u/Outrageous_Height_98
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/980bnGi
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0
Post a Comment
Read more

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...
Post a Comment
Read more