Skip to main content

Displaying images chronologically on Google Images

Hi!

I am merely a mediocre web developer, when this client came to me I thought he was going to ask only for small changes, but apparently, he wants help in a part of web development I am not that familiar with yet.

Currently, I got this client who wants his images chronologically (recent - oldest) on Google Images. I told him it was possible, but after doing some research, I am starting to have my doubts. His site is being hosted on Wordpress, and I have gotten access to all his posted content.

After digging around in the content itself, I noticed almost none of the images have some way to show when they were uploaded with what period they are connected (picture of steam trains would have to do with 1850, that kind of connection).

What is the best way to solve this problem? Is it even solvable?

Thanks for the help. (if you need any more info pls ask so, this client is of significant worth to me)

submitted by /u/RubenNijhuis
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/2YkXGpC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...