Skip to main content

Using 2 long tail keywords in one Youtube video title. Pros and cons?

When uploading a new video I try to optimize my SEO to have more chance of the video ranking well. I usually use 2 long tail keywords in my title just to try to rank on both of them. This gives me the feeling if one doesn't work maybe the other will. I am wondering if this can backfire and if it's much better to just try to rank for 1 long tail keyword.

For example when I make a video about building an aquascape (aquarium) I would use something like:

My Hardscape Aquarium setup and nano aquascape tutorial

long tail keyword 1: Hardscape Aquarium setup

long tail keyword 2: nano aquascape tutorial

​

Whats your opinion? Nothing wrong with using 2 long tail keywords or definitely stick to 1?

submitted by /u/osrs4awayout
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/3f8pBBj
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0
Post a Comment
Read more

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...
Post a Comment
Read more