Skip to main content

Pillar content question

With the pillar content and (I can't remember the term for the posts that stem from the pillar page,) to link to related posts?

Is it good for posts that are connected to a pillar page let's say content marketing, then there's a post that links to it about marketing using custom links on social media, so this post would then also link to the social media pillar, if that makes sense.

So it kind of ends up being a spider web at points rather than one pillar and content surrounding that. I hope you follow, my question is, is that best practice?

Obviously I mean when topics are actually related and relevant, is it ok for them to interlink? Is that the goal?

I'm sure I know this but I'm mapping a plan for a site and just want to be sure. Thanks for your help.

submitted by /u/Wannabe_a_Blogger
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/32SbbEV
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0
Post a Comment
Read more

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...
Post a Comment
Read more