Skip to main content

SEMrush says volume of 20, Ahrefs says 700. Which to trust?

Hi all,

I found a keyword I'd like to rank for with a blog post. I have a therapy private practice with a niche focus, so I don't need super high volume posts. That being said, SEMrush said the keyword's volume is 20 per month, while Ahrefs said the volume is 700 per month. Which would you trust?

I've heard that Ahrefs often understimates, but that doesn't make sense with these numbers.

Thanks for any help!

submitted by /u/EntrepreneuralSpirit
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/tnC7WfV

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...