Skip to main content

Question about editing and republishing existing content

I started a blog not long ago, but back then I had no idea about keyword, meta description, alt text etc... I focussed in creating content, but not really optimizing for SEO. After some months I notice that I basically have no impressions, so I wanted to edited all my posts and try to use more long-tail keywords, to try to be more competitive in niche topics.

Now my question: if I would everyday edit all of my blog posts, change their titles, meta description, maybe even the url slug (causing then redirects), will google punish it? I mean, I am not having many impressions at the moment anyways, so I thought there are no risk in doing so. But I was wondering if every page would have a different title and url slug, if this would be really bad for my long term SEO.

submitted by /u/nyad_k
[link] [comments]

from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News https://ift.tt/CEDJFvt

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...