Skip to main content

Google Crawl Stats: 89% Refresh, 11% Discovery & lots of image crawling, is this normal?

Hey everyone,

I was checking my Google Search Console Crawl Stats report and noticed:

  • Refresh: 89%
  • Discovery: 11%

I also see that Googlebot is crawling a lot of image URLs compared to HTML pages.

I've been following Google Search Essentials and SEO best practices, including:

  • XML sitemap submitted and updated
  • Proper internal linking
  • High-quality, original content
  • Fast-loading pages
  • No intentional duplicate or thin content
  • Regular publishing

Even after following Google's guidelines, Refresh is much higher than Discovery.

A few questions:

  • Is 89% Refresh / 11% Discovery considered normal?
  • Does heavy image crawling affect crawl budget or slow down the discovery of new pages?
  • Have any of you seen similar Crawl Stats on your sites?
  • Is there anything worth optimizing, or is this just normal Googlebot behavior?

Thanks in advance for any insights!

submitted by /u/avatar_leo
[link] [comments]

from The SEO Authority https://ift.tt/M4FGXK0

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...