Skip to main content

Mortgage recruiting SEO: how would you separate lender and candidate search intent?

I run a mortgage recruiting and advisory business serving two audiences: lenders hiring loan officers and branch managers, and mortgage professionals considering a career move. We also offer mortgage sales coaching and an affinity continuing-education catalog.

Our site has separate employer service pages, candidate career pages, and practical recruiting guides. For a phrase like 'mortgage recruiters,' either audience could be searching. For 'loan officer recruiting,' a service page and a how-to guide can both be relevant.

For those who have worked on recruitment sites, what evidence do you use to decide whether overlapping rankings are healthy mixed intent or a real consolidation problem? Would you keep an employer service page and a candidate page separate, with clear audience language and contextual links, or use a shared recruiting hub?

Also, what original proof has helped your service pages compete: a documented search process, anonymized case studies with outcome limits, or something else? I'm interested in what you tested and how you measured qualified employer inquiries separately from candidate inquiries. No link drops or sales pitches needed.

submitted by /u/North_Age3938
[link] [comments]

from The SEO Authority https://ift.tt/Q96UadA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Local seo vs. natiowide seo?

I've done SEO for local businesses but I recently got my first client that sells an item nation wide. ​ Any suggestions for doing nationwide SEO? ​ I am used to making geopages for local towns. I was going to do the same with some input from the client about what cities or towns he would like to show up in? submitted by /u/Letmeinterviewyou [link] [comments] from Search Engine Optimization: The Latest SEO News http://bit.ly/2JHy0k0

Clients site has a weird issue with 302 redirects that I haven't seen before.

Site is in Drupal, hosted on Amazon CDN & Cloudflare. So here's a quick breakdown: The site itself works normally. It's a bit dated, but you can click on links and navigate around as you'd expect. Seeing no obvious issues, I run a Screaming Frog crawl to begin my audit. Only 5 pages were picked up by the crawl which was super weird, since all internal links are regular html and there shouldn't be any issues. So I go through the site and manually collect a bunch of URLs, which I submit to SF again as a list. Every single link bar the 5 originally crawled return a 302, with the 'redirect' pointing back to the home page. Except as I said, those pages don't browser redirect. Browser side, they work fine. I guess they redirect the crawl bot though, since the rest of the site is functionally invisible. Other tools I've looked at say that the pages return simultaneous 302 and 200s, which doesn't make too much sense. These 302s are also old enough ...